Tags: online chess, chess online, play chess online, chess, online chess, chess, backgammon online
Chess Forum
kttstudios.com << online chess - < chess - chess > - chess online >>
| From | Message | Posted by bhidragon
kttstudios.com
12/13/2007
16:52:18
Play online chess |  Subject: Strategy v. tactics v. position
Message:
There's a lot of discussion on the board about what people mean by "a tactical player" or "e4 leads to a tactical game", etc. You run into these terms in chess books ... and on chess sites ... and they can be a bit confusing. Here's my take on the differences. Actually, there are two different comparisons being made.
The first is Strategy v. Tactics. In this case, "strategy" refers to your long-range goal in the game given a specific position. This includes the big questions like "do I attack the castled King or try to push a pawn through on the Q-side", or, "do I try to trade down to an end-game or keep playing a middle game"? The term "tactics" here refers to the specific moves you use to accomplish your strategy.
The second comparison is that of Positional v. Tactical positions. Open postions, more likely to flow out of e4 openings, are considered more tactical in nature ... where things happen very quickly and big food fights are the norm. More closed positions, resulting form d4 ... QGD for example ... rely more on positional maneuvering for much of the game.
To confuse the issue even more, players tend to think of themselves as tactical, strategic or positional ... which may or may not be the case in fact.
Make sense?
| Posted by lighttotheright
kttstudios.com
12/13/2007
17:12:14
Play online chess |
Message:
Let me try to make this simple.
'Tactical' refers to what you do; 'strategic' refers to what you plan to do; and 'positional' refers to what you possibly can or cannot do.
| Posted by ganstaman
kttstudios.com
12/13/2007
18:27:59
Play online chess |
Message:
The problem I have with this is that while more 1.e4 openings are tactical and more 1.d4 openings are strategic, that says nothing about an individuals personal repertoire. You could play only very strategic, non-tactical 1.e4 openings or crazy tactical 1.d4 openings. So unless you plan on rolling a 20-sided die to choose your opening, it really makes no sense to think: "Okay, this game starts 1.e4 so it's going to be tactical."
Also, I think it was Eric Schiller who said: amateurs don't have styles, they just have a set of weaknesses. In other words, if any of us thought that we were very positional, strategic players, it probably means that we need to work on our tactics. I think this is true.
———
Hikaru Nakamura's Great Chess Triumph — On the day the Serbian tennis player Novak Djokovic won the Australian Open in Melbourne, the American chess grandmaster Hikaru Nakamura, 23, achieved the best success of his life. He won the chess equivalent of a Grand Slam event - the Tata Steel Chess tournament in the Dutch coastal town of Wijk aan Zee ahead of the world's four top-rated grandmasters. "I cannot remember the last time an American won a major chess tournament. I hope my victory will make for greater interest in chess back home in the [United ]States," happy Hikaru said after his victory. On the way to first place, Nakamura defeated six opponents, drew six games and lost once, for a 9-4 score. He outpaced the world chess ...
Posted by bhidragon
kttstudios.com
12/14/2007
03:20:56
Play online chess | True
Message:
Ganstaman is correct ... for example look at the Sicilian, which can be very open or quite closed depending on the systems played by the opponents. I was only refering to the "reasonably expected in general" types of positions in the openings.
The main point was this -- there's a bit of difference between "tactics" and "tactical positions" or "tactical players".
———
Chess: When one false move is fatal — With so few chess pieces left on the board, absolute precision is essential. Carlsen-L'Ami, Tata Steel 2011. What should Black play? This is from the top section of the recent Wijk aan Zee chess tournament and continues our theme of defence. RB: When I look at this I get the same feeling of panic and gloom I get when my 11-year-old son brings me his maths homework for my so-called help. His questions require a simple precise answer, and that's what's needed here – absolute precision, no spinning off into creative fantasy. With so few pieces on the board, one false move is invariably fatal. What's the threat? If the Black king moves to the h-file, there's always the danger of ...
Posted by ionadowman
kttstudios.com
12/14/2007
04:42:51
Play online chess | Perhaps an epigram ...
Message:
... might adequately state the difference between tactics and strategy:
"Tactics is what you do when there's something to do; strategy is what you do when there's nothing to do" ;-)
Or, one might argue that tactics is the means by which a strategy is carried out. Plans can be strategic or tactical, though the further ahead you are looking, and the less move-specific, the more likely the plan is to be strategic in scope.
A tactical player will still make strategic decisions, for example, to create and to maintain the kind of dynamic disequilibrium that will maximise the chances of situations arising that can be exploited by tactical means. Even Mikhail Tal found it occasionally preferable to proceed by "strategic" means, if any imbalance that he might be able to bring about favoured his opponent too much.
———
Nakamura Wins Tata Steel Chess Tournament — Hikaru Nakamura of the United States emerged as the winner of the elite section of the Tata Steel chess tournament in the Netherlands after a spate of draws in the final round on Sunday. Nakamura finished with 9 points, a half point ahead of Viswanathan Anand of India, the world chess champion. Magnus Carlsen of Norway and Levon Aronian of Armenia tied for third, with 8 points each, while Vladimir Kramnik of Russia and Maxime Vachier-Lagrave of France were another half point back, tied for fifth. In the final round, Nakamura had Black against Wang Hao of China. Rather than act like a wallflower and try not to lose, Nakamura played aggressively, even offering to sacrifice ...
| | |
|